Richard Kiel, the actor who played Jaws in the James Bond films, gave a great example of the contextual self in this Late Night interview: (Around the 7m mark)

It’s pretty funny to me: Kiel had a problem; working as a bouncer, he had to deal with drunk people. Some of those drunks took it as a challenge to pose a threat to his authority-through-sheer-size. As an act of self-preservation (and probably also for the sheer fun of it), Kiel essentially learned to laugh like the village idiot and shake the drunk around in acknowledgement. He amplified his presence and potential as a physical threat in order to dissuade.

This is definitely a stark example of the way people modify their behavior in various contexts in order to get the result they need or want.

• Can you think of contexts in which you have done the same?
• Have you taught yourself to act, in a sense?
• Are there any contexts in which more acting on your part may be called for?
  • Remember that sometimes acting can enable an an unhealthy form of avoidance. Where is that line, for you?

With all that said, I enjoyed watching Mr. Kiel’s on Youtube after seeing him again recently in Moonraker.

Filed in:

(Click/tap to enlarge image)

Currently I have four INFJ clients with whom I’ve spent a significant amount of billable time over the last 10 years. Thinking over our relationships and past projects, here’s what I recommend in order to make the most of the INTJ-INFJ relationship.

Introduction: Conflictors in Type

INFJ Characteristics

• The INFJ has a deep need to create something that is special.
• The INFJ will find examples of others being special, and use those for inspiration.

INTJ Characteristics

• The INTJ has a deep need to create something that is effective.
• The INTJ will find examples of others being effective, and incorporate the techniques.

Furthermore, the two types base their communications on these principles. The INFJ expects an amount of deference to the fact that they are special. The INTJ expects an amount of deference to the fact that they are effective.

For this reason, conflict can easily occur as each struggles to get more of what they want from the other, for whom that need is in fact a blind spot (INTJ Fe & INFJ Te).

INTJs should be especially careful not to assume that just because they can’t see any relationship conflict, it doesn’t exist. INFJs are often extremely good at hiding their true feelings on the matter at hand. They may do this in order to preserve relationship harmony; hover, no matter how much harmony is gained by repressing one’s feelings, such behavior on its own will probably not be able to support the constructive problem solving required of an INTJ-INFJ team.

For that reason, it’s best for the INTJ to help uphold their role in the relationship in the most proactive way possible. The tips below can help you do exactly that.

Minimizing Conflict with the H3 Interaction Model

Introduction

This is my personal INTJ framework for working with INFJs. For convenience, I’ll call it the H3 Interaction Model, and treat it as a whole body with three layers. Those layers are:

1. Help
2. Harmonize
3. Heal

If Harmonize and Heal seem uncomfortable to you, that’s normal for an INTJ; read on and try to keep an open mind.

H3, Part 1: Help

Helping is the core of this creative process. It is crucial to dive in with the intent of helping the INFJ, rather than producing something for yourself, or for your team. The difference in mindset should help an INTJ understand that their task also has a group or social dimension, rather than a simple work product. It is crucial to begin to gain permission from your partner or group, and this can only be done by speaking their language.

Help is useful as a first stage for INTJs, because INTJs are usually excellent at providing the more concrete assistance that an INFJ might need in implementing an idea.

1. At some point, you can probably help the INFJ by emphasizing that they can be very direct with you.
   1. “Just so you know, I’m kind of dense sometimes and can miss really subtle hints, so please be really direct with me if you don’t feel like I’m hearing you.”
   2. If you beat yourself up a bit, you are giving them permission to be vulnerable. (Don’t worry, the damage to your ego won’t last. :-))
2. Try to be an order of magnitude less direct with your own language.
   1. INFJs have told me: “Words mean everything to me.”
   2. Be gentler than you think you need to be.
   3. “What I’m kind of hearing [from you] is [thing], is that right?”
   4. Instead of “Just do X,” consider language like, “I don’t mean to try to fix all your problems for you, but have you considered something like X?”
   5. Instead of “Stop doing Y,” try “if there’s any way we could do Y differently, I’d really appreciate that—I don’t mean to be a pain.”
   6. Why do all this? Because they’re probably doing it for you! That’s how INFJs typically operate. If you can give some of that back to them, you’ll gain more of their trust and confidence.
3. Listen to the INFJ as if you are assuming they are correct. Keep your mind mostly open and give your inner critic some time off—for now.
   1. This is not the same as agreeing with everything the INFJ says
      1. If you disagree, simply note and hold onto that thought for now.
   2. If you can’t stand it, don’t do it—but it’s worked well for me.
4. If at all possible, put their ideas into place first, then give your feedback.
   1. So rather than letting your intuition explain to the INFJ right up front, “that’s not going to work,” go do it, or part of it, or think about it, then come back and relate your experience of it working or not working.
   2. This is hard if your intuition is really dominant in the discussion, but remember it’s healthy to use your secondary objective measurement skills as a problem solving aid. Intuition + measurement = success, very often. Intuition by itself can lead to groundless arguments and alienation.
5. Try to see things from their POV.
   1. INFJs will often pull original concepts—sometimes surprisingly original concepts, out of a hat.
   2. But: Original concepts can be really fun, even if we do put effectiveness aside for a little bit.
      1. Remember that you’ll be measuring effectiveness anyway, as a good INTJ, so it’s not like you’re giving away your baby here.
   3. They still value your input. They may not speak the language, but they want to hear it!
      1. It’s worth your time to learn to empathize with INFJs and call out their feelings.
   4. INFJs will tend to punish themselves, and nobody wants that. Letting them have their way will often make them more conscious of the fact that you aren’t getting yours. They’ll feel prompted to ask for your input, and will try to find ways to harmonize.
6. Allow extra time for getting the INFJ to let their feelings out.
   1. They usually need help with this, as their key cognitive problem solving method is the expression of feelings.
      1. Example: “I got the feeling you weren’t happy with the last one we worked on.”
      2. Example: “You seem so inspired, this is great!” (listen to their response and engage with it)
      3. Try not to talk about yourself very much; they will sometimes latch onto this and attempt to encourage you to do more of it, to their own detriment.

H3, Part 2: Harmonize

The help you give (in Part 1) needs to take place under a layer of relationship harmony, or you risk coming off as fake or even harmful to the creative process. The INTJ will need to begin to communicate their own needs or thoughts, and for maximum effect, this should be done with the goal to harmonize as much as possible while meeting the needs of everyone in the group, including oneself.

If the INTJ’s needs are e.g. “my way or the highway,” this may not work, of course, so it’s good to be aware of the risks of relying heavily on Ni as a convergent problem-solver.

1. Give all feedback in a sensitive way. Example:
   1. A website design created by the INFJ is not realistic or effective in the ways the company needs, and will alienate huge chunks of its audience and harm SEO because it doesn’t contain any text, just abstract imagery.
      1. “You know, this is a beautiful one-page website. The colors, everything just works. The only thing I’m feeling is a sort of disconnect with our audience—those who really want to read all about us and what we do. Is there anything we can do about that?”
      2. Stay away from “we need to” statements as much as possible.
      3. Remember that a criticism of their work is a sensitive spot (inferior Se) to an INFJ and an INTJ both. Use very light language, explain how you feel rather than saying how it is.
2. When it’s time to implement their ideas, post-discussion, feel free to add in your own.
   1. INFJs are not huge detail people. As long as their vision has been captured, add-on ideas will often go either unnoticed or uncared about.
   2. In this way there is often plenty of space for a compromise.
   3. This may in fact be the only way you feel it is possible to implement your ideas given the sensitivity of the situation, so you might as well try it out if that’s the case.
3. Allow for the INFJ to act as irrationally (as it appears to you) as they need to. Remember that their logic function is very subjective, and builds from the ground up rather than building on existing frameworks. While you may not enjoy the way it has to reinvent the wheel all the time, this is how some of the world’s best thinkers have developed extremely solid frameworks throughout history.

H3, Part 3: Heal

Healing is the outer shell that needs to surround this entire process or experience. Regardless of how uncomfortable it may sound to a novice INTJ, a healing environment simply provides ongoing affirmation and appreciation that helps the INFJ understand their important role and feel they have the INTJ’s permission to be their own best self.

1. Remember that your key leverage points with an INFJ will involve extraverted feeling—putting yourself in their shoes. You may see the relationship as a work project or work experience, but it’s a relationship, first and foremost. Let’s try some of these things:
   1. Example: Noticing their mood and asking how they’re doing. Listen actively and draw out more when you can.
   2. Example: Noticing when the INFJ is getting you to talk about you for a long time, and calling them out on it. Ask and make it your job to turn on their problem-solving, feeling-expressing verbal skills.
   3. Example: Remembering their birthday and saying something about it
   4. Example: Reminding the INFJ at some interval that you have been thinking about them, or the project, or a shared experience.
   5. Did the INFJ take a big step? Thank them. Tell them you were impressed. Help them know that their contributions are noticed.
      1. It would be most useful to drop any perfectionism to which you hold yourself, during this process.
   6. You may find it useful to employ a spreadsheet or calendar reminders throughout this process.
2. Make sure you are making time in life to use your own gifts.
   1. Is there a creative project you’re working on, away from this project?
   2. What are you learning from the INFJ? What kind of research could be done to expand that?

Tempering Your Approach to Fit Your Comfort Level

Most INTJs will feel more comfortable with Helping than Healing. The model intentionally reflects this, as you can see by the Direction of Personal Growth indicator in the graphic above.

INTJs should feel free to go as far as they’d like in applying the model, keeping in mind the benefits to pushing themselves (personal growth) and risks to pushing themselves too far (irritation, anxiety, etc.).

I believe it would be most helpful to keep a log or a journal for the purpose of reflecting on one’s own comfort or discomfort in using the various stages of the model.

Additional Tips

• Probably don’t jump in to tell INFJs what their personality type is, if you ever considered doing that without a proper introduction and monitoring of their feelings about it. INFJs sometimes feel violent opposition to the idea of type, due to their inner need to affirm the uniqueness of each and every person. They may be very attuned to the negatives of what they see as “labeling.”
• Use your INTJ objective thinking by measuring the results you are getting. Are these efforts working?
• Use subjective thinking to make and refine your own framework. This will make you more efficient should you need to work with this person or type of person again.

These are principles and techniques that I definitely have not mastered yet, but I feel a huge sense of relief now that I am aware of them.

There is a lot of potential for conflict between INFJ and INTJ, but if we work to understand and refine our approach, I believe we INTJs can help make things go much more smoothly.

Filed in:

Most people find telemarketers and spam very annoying, and I think INTJs especially are likely to get very annoyed by the interruption. Some of us seek ways to play with or break the system, rather than just hanging up the phone or deleting the email.

Back when I was in university, I enjoyed joking around with telemarketers. I remember during one call I used a high-pitched voice and acted like a rather slow, immature adult male, asking all kinds of innocent questions about the product being sold. Eventually the caller couldn’t stop laughing and her supervisor came on the line. Then they put me on speakerphone and hung up after another minute or so of laughter.

A few years after I started my business, I started getting Skype spam for business products. I engaged one of the spammers and found out they were from another country. In that case I pretended that they had contacted me separately about another matter entirely, and using their own terms as a sort of code language, proceeded to send them attachments from U.S. defense industry companies, like PDF ads for weaponry, small helicopters, etc. I expressed that I was happy to help them with their “interior problems.”

Of course, I immediately regretted that one. The spam stopped almost instantly (for the time being) after I received a forthright reply in protest, but I do think my response was overkill. I shudder to think that my response to a telemarketer could have resulted in some (semi-)innocent person being marked as a potential troublemaker by their government, or worse.

Just recently I received an unsolicited “private number” call from a company and told the caller, “hey, what is your company name? You called a cell phone, this is not cool, do you realize that?” The caller spelled out the company name for me, then said, “well, we are an offshore company…” as if that made it OK to engage me in a way I didn’t want to be engaged. I then asked to be removed from their phone list. The caller just ignored that and continued with his sales talk. So then I replied, “OK, so your company name is [name], right? I am going to write a blog post about your company and this phone call, sound good to you?” This seemed to shock the caller, who said, “ah…..no” and hung up. His voice cracked a bit and he sounded like he wanted to be done with the call.

That last one went pretty well. Probably better than sending weapons documents. You would not believe how kitted out some of those PDFs are, by the way.

Filed in:

• This was interesting to me on a global politics level.
  • How does the Chinese government see this announcement?
    • We’ve got to get in this game.
      • Gather as much information as possible.
      • Encourage international involvement so that the machinations come closer to your own shores (e.g. Japan) for easier infiltration, influencing, etc.
      • Develop strategy for response to this. For example, the issue of ecological damage might be a great leverage point with which to influence international opinion.
    • We’ve got to prepare for any outcomes that can harm us
      • Technology development will be huge here. We will be out-developed.
  • How do other governments see this announcement?
    • A broad guess: Money.
      • Either losing it (to being out-competed in space technology—Russia)
      • Or gaining it (related services, expertise, etc.)
  • Mutually-assured destruction: Is it assured anymore, when you’ve got people living off-planet?
    • If it’s not assured, don’t we have a problem on our hands?
    • Example: The colony could be an off-world military asset.
    • How hard would it be for an adversary to wipe out a Mars colony? What would be necessary at the various stages of colony growth? And in return, how could the colony be hardened or made resistant to attack or infiltration?
• Cognitively speaking this was also very interesting.
  • It’s like a Ni+Te dream story.
  • Musk is a great model for INTJs.
    • Dream it up with Ni (introverted intuition). Dream as big as you can!
    • Use Te (extraverted thinking) to measure the requirements and run the numbers.
    • Result: Probably something pretty great, even if it doesn’t match your original vision exactly.
  • Most INTJs will probably never reach half of their potential, if you express potential even as “one Musk unit” or something like that.
  • As an INTJ, I need to dream bigger.
  • And I also need to back that up with measurement, spreadsheets, assessments, new frameworks as needed, etc.
  • I don’t need to be Musk himself to be happy, but I’d be bummed if I didn’t reach for my maximum potential
    • Leveraging my own gifts of course, not necessarily Musk’s.

Anyway, a fascinating state of events.

Filed in:

Every INTJ is different.

There are INTJs who feel totally in control of their lives.

There are INTJs who feel like victims every day.

There are INTJs who love dry humor and joke grenades.

There are INTJs who absolutely do not get jokes.

Some INTJs can’t accept these differences. They think, “oh, she didn’t get the joke. She must be an ISTJ instead of an INTJ.” (Holy cow.)

Instead of “that’s new to me,” we zoom right back to the typical “oh, I already know everything about INTJs and therefore, that must not be one.”

On the other side of this, perhaps people have accused you of not being INTJ enough to be an INTJ. Dario Nardi says people have told him he’s actually NF, or probably SP.

He chooses to take it as a compliment.

Filed in:

“Nobody ever complained that Einstein wasn’t a great painter.” —My INTJ dad

Part of the INTJ journey is discovery. Discovery of your gifts, discovery of your weaknesses. If your weaknesses piss you off, that’s normal. Especially for an INTJ—we sometimes think it’d be best for us just to become good at everything.

(Which: Isn’t that like the dumbest idea ever? Seriously.)

If you want to develop your gifts, that’s normal.

If you want to develop your weaknesses, that’s normal, too.

But I will bet on the former any time. Wish I could say that about the latter.

Understanding my gifts has been the most rewarding part about Jungian psych and MBTI for me. I found gifts I didn’t even know I had, and I hope you find the same. Weaknesses can always wait.

Filed in:

The traditional INTJ “blind spot” cognitive function is known as “extraverted feeling,” or Fe for short. Have any of the following ever made you uncomfortable? Maybe you rolled your eyes at them, or joked about them?

• Terms of romantic endearment and other similarly “feely” or “gushy” language
• Respect for, and deference to, social authority and position “Esteemed Sir, we humbly thank you for deeming it worth your time to…”
• Phrases like “Warm regards” at the end of an email (personally I get as far as “best regards” and then I’m shot)
• Polite, happy small talk that feels like it can go on forever
• Creating or discussing “safe spaces” where people can “express or feel what they need to feel”
• Deciding what to eat at a restaurant, based on how it will make your dining partner feel?
• Deciding how to introduce yourself, and downplaying yourself, communicating more emotively, or acting out of authority, based on the social hierarchy-level or even job title of the person you are greeting?
• Writing a letter of recommendation for someone you feel like you barely know on the surface?

Maybe you’ve heard: INTJs are “thinkers, not feelers.” But this hides the important truth that we are feelers, just different feelers than the extraverted kind.

How INTJs typically “feel”

In the most common Jungian function stack model of personality, INTJs use “introverted feeling” (or Fi) as their tertiary psychological function. As a result, INTJs may:

• Feel attached to strong inner values, needing to “find the me” in whatever they do
• Attach warmly to animals
• Attach warmly to people who seem like “lost causes” or outcasts, wishing to affirm their essential acceptance of their humanity
• Feel devoted or loyal, especially to someone they feel is loyal to them
• Place a high price on their loyalty: For example, one failure to keep their trust merits a complete breakdown of all trust
• Behave in emotionally manipulative ways under high stress (for instance, telling very sad stories about one’s past in order to obtain sympathy)
• In extreme cases, be accused of selfishness and self-centeredness, especially by those who prefer the more socially-oriented extraverted feeling.
• Hesitate to recommend someone unless they feel like they really know and trust that person’s character in depth

Some of this probably sounds ridiculous too, but Fi is a necessary part of the human experience. When we use Fi in a black and white manner it can cause problems, but in normal, day-to-day use it also may bring creative opportunities and help us feel like our life is worthwhile.

I like to recommend using Ti (introverted thinking) to develop frameworks or sets of rules for allowing our feelings to guide our decisions.

For more on Fi and Ti, I recommend Dario Nardi’s book, 8 Keys to Self-leadership.

Anyway, back to extraverted feeling…

“Fe,” or extraverted feeling, is the counterpart to introverted feeling. Where Fi is big on one’s own subjective values, Fe works with a broader set of widely-understood cultural values and standards.

If Fe was a person, he or she might be, for example, a fan of the governor, the mayor, the CEO. Fe is big on the importance of one’s official role. Fe loves certifications, qualifications, and advanced degrees.

Fi, on the other hand, might thumb up its nose at all that, and rather hang out with a more authentic person, even if they live in a gutter.

Fe shudders at gutter people, unless the entire social group is shuddering. Then Fe will tend to shudder right along with them for the time being.

Fe is sometimes found combined with Ti in a personality type, with the result being a person who is capable of swindling people with a honeyed tongue, or a savvy political maneuverer. A very social, very crafty plotter. In positive cases, perhaps a Fe/Ti user will use their convincing charisma and social grace to find clever ways to benefit humanity, or create opportunities for the disadvantaged.

Fe is fantastic at energizing group relations, and maintaining a balanced sense of positive energy, so that great things can be accomplished.

Still, regardless of the upsides, Fe can seem really uncomfortable and worthless to the INTJ.

And that’s really too bad: Even if you’re an INTJ, you still need to build rapport and interact with others. We all do. Fe is actually important, it keeps society and group cultures moving along generally peacefully and we can appreciate that in rational terms because it’s already in place and it’s working, helping our civilization forge ahead.

A funny example of Fe-style communication

When I was a kid, when everyone was exchanging cassette tapes with their girlfriend or boyfriend, two of these tapes ended up in my possession. One, I either stole from my sister or she left it behind when she got married and moved out. Now, as she is a Fe-aux, and had a tertiary-Fe boyfriend, it was hilarious. The tape was made by this boyfriend, who uses Fe about as awkwardly as we INTJs use Fi.

I pressed Play and heard this:

“Hi Carmeleeeeee [I’m pretending my sister’s name is Carmel here because I think it’s funny]…I hope you are having a…just a…wonderful day. It’s so sunny here where I am, the birds are tweeting outside…all I can think of is you. I hope you enjoy these songs, sweetheart. Love you so, so much!”

I can’t communicate the various vocal tones here, but just imagine a grown man trying to sound like a young woman and you’ll get the idea just fine.

Another tape, I later received from an ENFJ girlfriend, Fe-dominant. In that case, it wasn’t that the tape had corny language on it (which it did), but more the fact that it was a thing that was done back then, a relationship formality. That’s a huge deal to a Fe-user. And really I just put it into my cassette player, listened for the first few minutes, and turned it off. It was just so awkward.

The thing about Fe-dominant personality types (ESFJ, ENFJ) is that sometimes the “empathetic and respectful” language gets so well used that you feel like you’re talking to a corporate mission statement. In environments like these, where Fe is overused, you can usually find INTJs and INTPs who are so burned out by corporate life that they read Scott Adams, get incredibly pessimistic, and then eventually quit to become Buddhist monks, or maybe writers of satire.

In my opinion, it’s better to work to understand Fe (the Dario Nardi book mentioned above is a good start) and maybe integrate it into your life a bit, and still have the casual laugh about it, than to completely mock it and then end up completely unprepared when you end up managing Fe-doms or needing to work under them. That set of circumstances would almost be the definition of “suck” for an INTJ.

The Fe Blind Spot

There’s also an effect called the Fe Blind Spot, in which an INTJ or ISTJ will find themselves so wrapped up in their own Thinker-Planner perspectives that they say or do something completely inconsiderate and inappropriate with regard to others. For example, someone tells you their dog just died, and you reply by asking them if they’re ever going to finish that spreadsheet you need! This can feel incredibly embarrassing, especially when others point it out, or use it as leverage to take you down a notch.

So that’s Fe. I hope it made you cringe and roll your eyes a little bit. You introverted feeler, you.

Filed in: Feeling /64/ | Fe /20/

The other day my intuition (introverted intuition, or Ni) and introverted feeling (or Fi) combined in a surge of paranoia and negative fortune-telling. “It’s going to happen, I can feel it,” I told myself. “I need to prepare.”

A problem had come up, and, feeling powerless for a moment, my tendency to get a bit gloomy about the problem seemed to be getting the best of me.

One big problem with this is that I can be biased, in those situations, toward the most hyperbolic solutions. Like say I find a hole in my boat, while I’m out on the lake. What I tend to do (not in a real boat, of course) is decide, “this boat sucks. It’s old and probably isn’t worth fixing.” Then I jump out and start swimming.

Well, fine, if it’s necessary. But often I look back and realize that the swimming was not necessary at all.

As a solution to this kind of situation, this time I asked the oracle. The result was exactly the clarity I needed.

If you find yourself in a situation where you need more clarity, I suggest you give it a try, too.

It may help to get as specific about the problem as possible when typing in possible actions.

Also, I find it helpful to fill in all five slots (at least), as a way of pushing ourselves to ideate on solutions. INTJs are not the best ideators, generally preferring to converge toward one or two “best answers.”

I find it interesting that the Ask the Oracle tool connects with our INTJ extraverted thinking (Te), our need to take measurements and get an objective picture of the worth of various possibilities.

Since we will often “jump the stack” from Ni to Fi (First to Third function) in high-anxiety thinking, this sort of measurement system can be very useful. Our second function, extraverted thinking, is considered the INTJ “problem-solving” function.

Some INTJs already use it in abundance, but many INTJs never really naturally picked up on it and tend to jump the stack, from Ni to either to Fi or to Se (extraverted sensing). The latter would involve indulging one’s senses in order to solve problems, which rarely works out exceedingly well for INTJs. (Personally, I can go on the world’s longest run, or eat the world’s best-tasting sandwich, or walk on the world’s most beautiful beach, and return home without a single problem solved.)

Filed in:

TL;DR: It’s a simple wristwatch that has a vibrating alarm/timer.

Right now my favorite INTJ productivity tool, aside from plain-text editor software, is this Casio W735H-1AVCF wristwatch (non-affiliate links here people). It comes in several colors, and Casio also makes some G-Shock models with the vibration function.

Which leads me to why I like this watch.

It vibrates. And it has a timer that can be pre-set to whatever interval you want. The timer won’t auto-continue after the time is up, but a single button press restarts the timer.

The vibrating timer on my arm for about $25 USD has been a huge productivity helper. Here’s what I use it for:

• Long conversations
  • When you know you’ll be stuck talking to someone for a while
    • Like on a long car ride
      • Not even kidding, I’ve used it for this and will continue to do so
  • The vibration can remind you of your conversation-with-this-person framework. Link in case you missed the conversation on frameworks.
    • Example: When talking to an ESFJ, it becomes my reminder, every few minutes, to stop talking about myself and my thoughts, to empathize, to listen to cries for help in feeler-terms. To ask about details.
      • Oh BTW, one of my ESFJ friends mistook this watch for a G-Shock, which I thought was pretty cool.
      • I did not actually correct him, either
      • I do own a few G-Shocks but I use this watch way more, so that’s cool
• Any other framework-related item
  • Like in my deadline framework, this watch reminds me every 10 minutes that I am working on a deadline.
    • This means it’s easy to take a break for 10 minutes, guilt-free.
    • This also means that when I get too distracted, only 10 minutes will pass, max, before I’m reminded of that fact.
• Measurement of my day
  • Has it been a lot of vibrations since I got something done?
    • OK, time to refer back to my framework for getting things done, or to refine the framework somehow.

OK, so at least the $25 gets me that far.

Oooh, and I almost forgot: I really like the “Super Illuminator” light. It’s easily my favorite of all the lighting options on watches these days. The whitish light color is so…neutral. Who knew two little LEDs could bring such pleasure.

I realize that A) it’s dangerous to talk about tools with INTJs because all INTJs, practically from birth, Wish to Be Consulted About Productivity Tools and Getting Things Done. It’s just part of who we are. Inferior Se makes us very keenly aware of how much impact we’re having on the world, how much stuff we’re getting done. If there’s a way to get more done, we either already know about it or we want to know about it. (We also tend to repress an inner slouch who gets nothing done, ever. “The slouch is after us! Aaah, run! Work harder! Don’t stop!”)

Also B) I realize that phones can vibrate, they have apps, they have Pomodoro Timers with Advanced Features, and so on. Well, that’s fine but it’s not working for me at the moment. And I know there are smart watches that do other stuff too. I really like the novelty of this particular watch, I guess. The vibration is so subtle, the mechanism so simple. I’ve tried using apps on my phone and still do sometimes, so what the future holds, I don’t know.

Anyway, fun to talk about the tools a bit.

Oh, and BTW this talking countdown timer is freakin’ awesome too. I use it for exercise all the time. THIRTY SECONDS. TWENTY SECONDS. TEN. NINE. EIGHT… see? It’s like back when you worked for NASA, exercising on the Space Shuttle. Although they apparently use a slightly different model of kitchen timer. And they wear…business suits in space, that I didn’t know about.

Filed in:

Maybe you’ve had people tell you you’re smart. Maybe you’ve even received awards or accolades for being a smart person! In general, we INTJs tend to think we are pretty good thinkers.

(Personally I have found it helps to be dumb sometimes, but it’s also healthy to use and improve those Thinking skills.)

So it’s kind of funny, but one of our biggest blind spots is found in the area of thinking, even though we are considered a powerful bunch of Thinkers in general.

Is a Conflicting Mental Process Causing Blind Spots in Your Thinking?

The standard INTJ thinking process, known as extraverted thinking, or “Te”, can be extremely shallow and brittle. When we use Te, we reference measurements, look for hard, outside evidence, and rely on outside thinking and “objective proof” that things are completely “true” or “false”.

Relying on outside thinking! That sounds like a dependency, right? (Do I hear the sound of millions of INTJs cringing at the thought of being dependent on someone else’s thinking? First, don’t worry too much about it—but second: Let’s improve a bit in this area.)

An Embarrassing Problem when it comes to Original Thinking

When the time comes to be original thinkers then, to develop new thought, we can run into big problems.

For example—let’s say you are confronted with a huge problem that seems specific to you alone, and it can completely overpower you. In order to solve that, as a normal, Te-style INTJ Thinker, you’d go out and look for labels for that problem so you can find others who have already solved it.

Then you buy their books, or bookmark their website, or subscribe to their mailing list.

But what if it’s more efficient just to solve the problem on your own?

What if the key to your specific situation is to be subjectively creative and start from square one, analyzing your particular situation and developing your original theories and solutions?

This is where other personality types like INTPs, ENTPs, ISTPs, and ESTPs can really teach us hard lessons. They tend to use Ti, also known as introverted thinking, or analytical logic, to solve problems with their own brains.

My Professor Doesn’t Get It: He Wants Me to Use MY Brain

If you’ve ever studied under an INTP professor, perhaps you’ve heard this criticism of your research-based thinking: “You’re using other peoples’ brains to do your thinking for you!”

(Let’s get meta: You are on this blog why again? See? I’m doing all of your thinking for you. Well, again—all these thinking tools are useful, so we don’t want to throw out a perfectly good blog; I get that. And thanks for being here…but let’s balance things out a bit and you’ll enjoy the new skills!)

Ah, the painful takedown of Ti versus Te. Introverted Thinking versus Extraverted Thinking. Subjective original thought vs. Objective, unoriginal thought. Creating your own really cool wheel versus Not Reinventing Wheels, because someone else already did that!

Analyzing things yourself…vs. Googling The Answers in Order to be Efficient.

Well, I completely agree that if we’re not using Ti at all, or very much, we’re not really using the best of our brain, at least not in the ideal way.

What’s this Ti Process?

Ti, or Introverted Thinking, is a cognitive process or cognitive function, one of a set of eight. For convenience, here are some links for information on the whole set of cognitive functions:

• Ti: Introverted Thinking. General Ti Info and Blog Articles about Ti
• Te: Extraverted Thinking. General Te Info and Blog Articles about Te
• Fi: Introverted Feeling. General Fi Info and Blog Articles about Fi
• Fe: Extraverted Feeling. General Fe Info and Blog Articles about Fe
• Si: Introverted Sensing. General Si Info and Blog Articles about Si
• Se: Extraverted Sensing. General Se Info and Blog Articles about Se
• Ni: Introverted Intuition. General Ni Info and Blog Articles about Ni
• Ne: Extraverted Intuition. General Ne Info and Blog Articles about Ne

These functions, and your preferences for some of them in particular, play really important roles in your development and values. The functions that annoy you, or frustrate you, are more likely to create blind spots which can harm your personal or professional development.

Your preference for some of these functions, and not others, is what determines your personality type. For example, a typical INTJ is a Ni-Te personality type, an INFJ is a Ni-Fe personality type, and so on.

The nice thing is, you can learn to be flexible, and use gifts from every function to help yourself develop into a better problem-solver. You’ll be able to work better with others. You’ll also be better at convincing, or negotiating with, people who prefer different functions. If you’ve ever heard of the “win-win” negotiation, Ti can be a crucial ingredient in creating that outcome.

Giving conscious attention to the Ti function will help you learn to create and execute. It will help you to find leverage points in whatever area of interest you wish to pursue. And people of other personality types who really think Ti is cool, or rare, or special, will tend to recognize well-developed Ti. They’ll want your help in solving problems.

How is Ti Used?

When we use Ti, according to Dario Nardi, we “refer to, apply, align, and refine a framework.” Dario is a personality type professional who suggests that INTJs study and learn how to apply Ti.

What’s a framework? Think of a set of rules. For example:

• Rules for Having a Good Day
• How to Be More Productive at Work
• How to Work on My House on the Weekend without Losing my Temper

In fact, don’t just think about it, start on it right now. It will involve using your brain.

Also, perhaps painfully, it will involve lots of subjective thought. You’ve got to spend energy on asking: What would help? What might work? What would I do differently tomorrow, or next time?

I admit this is only painful if you were tightly tied to your objectivity-as-ego. Please drop that guard just a little bit, just make more room for the subjective you and your powerful brain to help yourself.

Ti as compared to Te

Applying your Te (extraverted thinking) should indeed be much more natural for you. When you use Te, you typically refer to, align, and refine a measuring device. For example, the scientific method. Or some other standard for measuring thought, results, whatever. Maybe you measure others’ thoughts on the matter by googling for answered questions on a given topic, at a site like Quora.

Te is super helpful, so it’s not that we’re trying to get rid of it. Very often INTJs will need to drone on and on about their problems, not in an emotional way, but in a very informational way in which we review our “status”. It’s like we’re reporting our measurements!

Typically what this is doing is creating a “safe intellectual space” in which we INTJs can measure the extent of our problems and begin to work in a solution-minded way. It’s helpful. It’s healthy. (And don’t tell me you don’t need a safe space —it stays!)

Going back to Ti, I think most INTJs don’t really use it much in creative situations. But I also think they enjoy it when they do. And I know for a fact that they enjoy it more, the more experience they gain with it.

A Deeper Exercise to Try

Here is a slightly deeper Ti exercise:

First, list some problems in your life:

• I am doing terrible at my job
• I need to negotiate with a person, or a group of people
• I love my hobby, and I want to figure out how to share my progress with other people
• I am doing terrible in my relationship with so-and-so
• I hate myself for doing unhealthy activity X when I’m stressed out
• I want to be a better friend

Now, for each of those problems:

1. Refer to a framework or set of rules relating to the problem (do some research OR create your own draft framework, including leverage points that come to mind. I encourage trying the latter because Te will bias you toward the former)
2. Apply the framework. Put it into practice next time the problem comes up.
   1. To develop a framework, look for points of leverage. You might isolate specific activities, for example, that really give you a boost in overcoming this specific types of problem.
3. Refine the framework. Make the framework more elegant over time.
   1. This is super important. If you let the framework stagnate, you cannot benefit from the compounding energy that results from its continual application and refinement.
   2. Ask yourself: When did I last try something new?
   3. Yes, a lot of INTJs get stuck here. They don’t always like altering things, and they worry that their new framework is so much worse than something that already exists out there!
4. Embrace the details! Allow the framework to deepen over time, and become its own familiar story, saga, or favorite recipe.

If you persist in this activity I think you’ll find an amazing thing happens: You’ll feel like you have a lot more leverage in your life.

Do you see how hands-on it is? You get to build something really powerful, over time. It’s great.

So dive in! Get more subjective. And think twice before you go right for Google to apply your Google-fu to find the world’s best pre-existing framework, tucked inside a PDF on some website employing weak file download obfuscation.

And it’s OK to make guesses! (Scientists may call your guesses “hypotheses”) Modify your approach until you gain leverage.

Then scale it into a world-class framework with its own PDF later on, if you’d like.

My Own Experience

I share a lot of my own frameworks here on the blog, and in other areas of my life as well. It’s been fun. And I plan to keep going!

Personally, I keep a bunch of text files in a folder called “Frameworks.” Under that folder I keep a Work folder, a Family folder, and so on. In “Work” there’s a text file with my own framework for having a great day at work. And another one for dealing with stressful meetings.

In my Finance folder, I’ve got a file for investing. It has a table of contents, a to-do list, a log of experiences, and some links to resources I appreciate (I integrate Te in this way, referring to others’ resources, research, measurements, and creations as well).

In Conclusion

Do you see how that might help you? Try it out. You could google up the answers, but don’t, this time. This is better. Refine your own framework, by yourself.

We INTJs will need to leverage both Te and Ti in order to become our best selves.

(If this article helped you, you know what to do. Or if not—your Ti can help you figure it out!)

Filed in: Therapeutic Practice /144/ | Ti /30/ | Essays /52/ | Control /110/ | Publications /44/ | Te /36/ | Productivity /119/ | Thinking /70/